Recently I read the article, Think Again by
William Deresiewicz and I am confused. I really like Mr. Deresiewicz’s writing;
his articles, Solitude and
Leadership and The
Disadvantages of an Elite Education are brilliant. His
ideas are coherent, his career admirable, and his use of words inspiring. This
is why I am confused; in 533 words he praises Portland for its beautification
projects and insults New York. In his next breath he backhands Portland for
being poorly educated while praises New York down to the airport workers for
being ‘on the ball’ intellectually.
The first part of the article that made me think again
was, “Portland, to be blunt about it, is not exactly bursting at the seams with
intellect. As another transplant recently remarked, the people are too
provincial, too poorly educated, and too apt to take personally arguments about
ideas.”
Too provincial. I find this funny because I joke that I
live in the provinces; Arizona, according to many outside the state, is not
known for its intellectual thought or progressive ideas (I use the term
progressive here non-politically; forward thinking). With my self-deprecation
out of the way I get tired of the major media outlets discounting 70% of the
country and focusing on the coasts. I understand that the northeast, Los
Angeles, and the San Francisco megaregions contain 30% of the US population
and are the political, technological, and media centers of the country but
there is plenty of culture and brilliant people to be found else, even in the
provinces.
Too poorly educated; I don’t know where to start. New
York is an old city for the United States and has been one of the global
centers of capitalism for a long time. With age and wealth comes philanthropy
and investment into higher education; the number of well-renown undergraduate
and graduate institutions is too long to list. Portland on the other other hand
is a moderately sized western city with enough higher education institutions to
meet the needs of the population with the two major state institutions located
a few hours south.
Continuing with the too poorly educated, in Portland,
between the ages of 25 and 34, 46.7% have a bachelors degree or higher while
50.4% have a bachelors of higher between the ages of 35 to 44. In New York,
between the ages 25 and 34, 46% have a bachelors degree or higher while 37.6%
have a bachelors degree or higher between the ages of 34 to 44. What do these
numbers tell us? On average Portland is more educated than New York. The
difference is, of course, is that New York is 13 times larger than Portland and New York
attracts students from all around the world to attend its numerous highly
acclaimed institutions.
The other quote that made me think again was, “It’s
remarkable how pleasant things can be when people put aside their selfishness
and think about the common good. You don’t have to be a genius. You just have
to not be a dick.”
Few problems in this world truly require geniuses;simple
logic, friendly cooperation, and strong leadership usually save the day. Maybe
the point of the article is that we all have to take a moment and just think and
act for the common good. New York, with its might, money, and splendor can’t
seem to get it right when it comes to urban beautification while Portland,
which to many does not have might, money, or splendor has gotten it right.
As Mr. Deresiewicz said, maybe the key is that you have to “act for the common good” and “not be a dick.” I am guessing that not all people in Portland act for the common good and there are dicks everywhere, but if you live in Portland as an adult it is a lifestyle choice. And when it comes to education this might be another choice; maybe people in Portland feel like they do not have to be the smartest dick in the room while in New York even the airport workers have to prove themselves to strangers.
No comments:
Post a Comment